Early Experience of Minimally Invasive Tubular Lumbar Microdiscectomy at a Tertiary Care Centre in Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59779/jiomnepal.1361Keywords:
lumbar microdiscectomy, minimally invasive surgery, Oswestry Disability Index, tubular retractor, Visual Analog ScaleAbstract
Introduction
Lumbar disc herniation is a leading cause of low back pain and radiculopathy. Open microdiscectomy, though effective, involves muscle dissection and longer recovery. Minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy aims to reduce these drawbacks. This study evaluates its early outcomes in Nepal.
Methods
Our observational study included patients who underwent MIS tubular lumbar microdiscectomy at our hospital from August 2023 to July 2024. Data on operative duration, blood loss, and return to work time were collected. Functional outcomes were assessed at three months using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for spinal and radicular pain.
Results
A total of 22 patients were included. The mean operative duration was 121.5 ± 31.67 minutes, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 60 ± 20.17 mL. The mean return to work time was 1.86 ± 0.2 weeks. At three months, the mean ODI score significantly improved from 54.36 ± 8.8 to 0.91 ± 1.47 (p < 0.001). VAS scores for spinal pain decreased from 3.05 ± 0.84 to 1.5 ± 0.3 (p < 0.001), and radicular pain from 4.91 ± 0.86 to 1.36 ± 0.65 (p < 0.001). No major complications occurred, and 5% of patients had transient paresthesia, which resolved spontaneously.
Conclusion
MIS tubular lumbar microdiscectomy an alternative procedure for lumbar disc herniation, offering short-term functional improvement. Long-term comparative studies are needed to assess its durability against open microdiscectomy.
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Institute of Medicine Nepal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.