Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue among Different Facial Patterns: A Cephalometric Study

Authors

  • Rajiv Yadav Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dental Clinical Sciences 1, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal Author
  • Neelam Yadav Multi-Specialist Dental Hospital Pvt Ltd, Kathmandu, Nepal Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59779/jiomnepal.1349

Keywords:

Cephalometry, facial pattern, soft tissue

Abstract

Introduction
With the advancement of the soft tissue paradigm, various soft tissue factors have been added to the orthodontic problem list for diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to examine the dimensions of facial soft tissues alongside various cephalometric parameters in orthodontic patients.

Methods
This observational study was conducted at Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dental Clinical  Sciences-1, TU Teaching Hospital. Three different groups based on the morphological patterns (brachyfacial, dolichofacial, and mesofacial) with soft tissue parameters of upper lip thickness (ULT), lower lip thickness (LLT), upper lip height (ULH), lower lip height (LLH), soft tissue chin thickness (SCT) were studied. X-rays selected for this study from 18-30 years old patients with no craniofacial deformities were selected. SPSS 21 was used for statistical analysis.

Results
The mean value of facial axis measurement (BaN.PtGn) was 90.02±4.140. The mean values of ULT was 14.51±2.74 mm, LLT was 16.33±1.87 mm, ULH was 28.21±3.66 mm, LLH was 47.43±4.66 mm, and SCT was 14.70±2.54 mm. The BaN.PtGn, ULT, and SCT were significantly different among three facial types. Brachyfacial facial type had higher ULT than mesofacial and dolichofacial types whereas higher SCT than mesofacial types. The correlation between different soft tissue measurements showed weak to very weak strength association.

Conclusions
Brachyfacial facial types had higher upper lip thickness than mesofacial and dolichofacial types and higher soft chin thickness than mesofacial types. There was no difference among gender in brachyfacial types, whereas male predominance was seen in mesofacial and dolichofacial type.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue among Different Facial Patterns: A Cephalometric Study. (2024). Journal of Institute of Medicine Nepal, 46(3), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.59779/jiomnepal.1349

Similar Articles

1-10 of 119

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.