Influence of Ureteric Orifice Configuration on Effective Insertion of Ureteral Access Sheath during Flexible Ureteroscopy

Authors

  • Amit Kumar Jha Department of Urology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Pawan Raj Chalise Department of Urology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Bhojraj Luitel Department of Urology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Suman Chapagain Department of Urology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Sujeet Poudyal Department of Urology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Manish Man Pradhan Department of Urology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59779/jiomnepal.1392

Keywords:

Ureteric access sheath, flexible ureterorenoscopy, uretric orifice configuration, virgin ureters

Abstract

Introduction 
Retrograde Intrarenal surgeries are facilitated by the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS) but it is not always possible to insert the sheath on the first attempt. The aim of the study was to determine the possible predictive factors enabling insertion of UAS during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS).
Methods
All consecutive patients undergoing fURS/RIRS who were not pre-stented were studied and data collected. The study parameters were the demographics of the patients, characteristics of the stones, and perioperative data, including the ureteric orifice (UO) configuration over introductory guidewire. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect the possible predictors of successful UAS insertion.
Results
In total, 78 patients who underwent primary fURS were included, with a mean age of 38.9±14.68 years and a male: female ratio of 2.25:1 with an average stone burden of 11.4 mm. There was successful primary insertion of UAS in 47(60.26%) patients. Out of them, 44 of the patients had rounded configuration of the ureteric orifice with a successful primary insertion of UAS in 17 (38%) patients whereas 30 (88%) patients had successful insertion in those with tented configuration of the ureteric orifice over a guidewire with a significant p value (<0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, a tent-shaped UO after guidewire insertion was the only significant predictor (OR:13.70 95% CI:3.76-50.10 with p-value<0.0001) for primary successful UAS insertion into virgin ureters.
Conclusion
Patients with tent-shaped UOs after insertion of a guidewire were more likely to have an UAS insertion on the first attempt in a virgin ureter.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 42

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.